中文摘要：

【目的】梳理国内外开放型同行评议相关模式、技术和存在的问题，为开放型同行评议在国内学术出版界进一步推广提供参考。 【方法】采用文献综述法，在Web of Science和中国知网中检索相关研究文献，对文献进行分析，并对应用开放型同行评议的出版商和期刊进行研究，最后对所得信息进行综合分析、归纳与评述。 【结果】根据不同应用场景下的需要，开放型同行评议呈现出多种应用模式。相关学者对评审数据存储、评审数据关联、评审流程支持、评审流程保护、评审专家激励等方面的技术进行了一系列探索。但开放型同行评议模式及相关技术还存在着一定的问题有待解决。 【结论】开放型同行评议在国内更好的发展还有待于构建可持续的培养体系、实施适合国内期刊的评议模式、积极建立统一的技术标准、创建相关主题期刊。

英文摘要：

[Purposes] This paper aims to sort out the related modes, technologies, and existing problems of open peer review at home and abroad, so as to provide reference for further promotion of open peer review in domestic academic publishing industry. [Methods] In this paper, literature review was used to search related research literature in Web of Science and CNKl, and the literature was analyzed. Publishers and journals applying open peer review were studied. Finally, the obtained information was comprehensively analyzed, summarized , and commented. [Findings] According to the needs of different application scenarios, open peer review presents a variety of application modes. Relevant scholars have made a series of explorations on the technologies of evaluation data storage, evaluation data association, evaluation process support, evaluation process protection , evaluation expert incentive, etc. However, there are still some problems to be solved in the open peer review mode and related technologies. [Conclusions] The better development of open peer review in China still needs to build a sustainable training system, implement a review mode suitable for domestic journals, actively establish a unified technical standard, and construct journals of related subjects.

本文链接：

https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/